Scorer: Van Persie
Assist: Walcott (Indirectly)
Mini-Analysis: Over-Zealous defending leads to a penalty kick for Van Persie, who makes no mistake.
In-Depth Analysis:
Arteta plays a quick throw into the corner of Aston Villa's Defensive 3rd, where Walcott is being tracked by Ciaran Clark.
At first it seems Walcott has nowhere to go, with Clark and Petrov potentially combining well to pressure in a 2 v 1 situation. With Walcott's speed, you would be happy to defend him with his back to goal, so why then does Clark aggressively try to win a ball in a place where Walcott has nowhere to go?
Walcott does well to trick Clark and gives Clark two options:
1. Try and keep up with one of the fastest players in the Premier League before he cuts the ball back into the danger area for Van Persie.
2. Foul Walcott and pray Guzan pulls of a miracle.
I would have taken my chances with option 1 because, Walcott still had to put in a good ball, Van Persie had to time his run to meet the ball, shoot past not only Guzan but also past the recovering defenders. Although each of these probably would have occurred because Van Persie is just that good, Villa stood a better chance from this scenario than a Penalty Kick with Van Persie taking it.
The Penalty:
For the Goalkeepers: This is not a fool proof method, but here is a tip for you. One of the rules of the thumb for Penalty Kicks is this; left footed players shoot right, right footed players shoot left. Statistically they just prefer to go across their body. Van Persie here is almost true to this rule but like I always say, these are elite players not NCAA II. He does shoot to the right, which Guzan (a fellow NCAA graduate) dives towards, but Van Persie puts the ball in an unreachable spot.
LESSONS:
- Defenders: If up against a fast player like Walcott, you do not want to be over aggressive in your approach. Yes, you want to close them down quick enough so that they cannot turn and run at you, as they are not as much of a danger when they have their backs to goal. Clark here however, makes the mistake of trying to tackle a player who has nowhere to go. With Petrov closing in to provide a 2 v 1 situation, Arsenal really have been gifted a goal here.
ASTON VILLA's GOAL:
Scorer: Albrighton
Assist: Vermaelen...
Mini-Analysis: Albrighton capitalizes on a technical error from Thomas Vermaelen.
In-Depth Analysis:
The simple question to answer in this sequence of events is this, should Vermaelen have headed the ball square to Mertesacker in the first place?
Looking at this shot, you could easily argue that Vermaelen had every right to head the ball to his defensive partner. Mertesacker arguably has time and space to play a quick two touch once he receives the ball and Arsenal can retain possession. However, would this pass violate one of the golden rules of possession, never play square passes?
Referring to the diagram above, a square pass is simply a pass where if intercepted has no defensive protection. In Soccer, diagonal passes are encouraged because it gives either the receiver of the ball or the passer of the ball a second chance to win the ball back if intercepted. At the point of interception during a square pass, the player is already in line with the last defender; whereas at the point of interception during a diagonal pass, the player still has ground to move into before they are past the last defender.
To illustrate, if the pass is at a forward diagonal, the interception is made in front of the passer who therefore has time, if only a little to recover and win the ball back.
The opposite would be true if the ball was passed backwards. This would mean the receiver of the ball would be behind the play, which means they can recover defensively somewhat and have a second chance of winning the ball.
We are talking fractions of a second within the angle of recovery, but at this level, fractions of a second matter.
That being said, I would not put the blame on Mertesacker. Yes, he was somewhat over-aggressive to correct the mistake from Vermaelen but it was not his technical mistake that had to result in his last ditch tackle attempt.
Credit must be given to Albrighton for how quickly he reacted to the error and also for finishing with such composure against one of the best young Goalkeepers in the Premier League, Wojciech Scezney. (Heard plenty of criticism about Arsenal's Goalkeepers over the past few seasons, but Scezney comes in and plays at a consistent high level and not an ounce of praise. Such a harsh world we live in...!)
LESSONS:
- I am being a bit harsh to Vermaelen. He had every right to do what he intended and on another day he would have pulled it off. That does not mean I should not use this as a close example of why to not play square passes. Do not do them. I lost count the amount of times my ex-coach Matt Lavinder (ironically an Arsenal fan) would scream it at our team, and hopefully you can understand why now. It offers no defensive recovery time and in a soccer era where defense against penetration is paramount, there is no place for such a pass that gives total penetration to the interceptor.
LESSONS:
- I am being a bit harsh to Vermaelen. He had every right to do what he intended and on another day he would have pulled it off. That does not mean I should not use this as a close example of why to not play square passes. Do not do them. I lost count the amount of times my ex-coach Matt Lavinder (ironically an Arsenal fan) would scream it at our team, and hopefully you can understand why now. It offers no defensive recovery time and in a soccer era where defense against penetration is paramount, there is no place for such a pass that gives total penetration to the interceptor.
NOTE: Final Arsenal Goal to Come...